SAE J2334 PDF

13 Aug Scope—The SAE J lab test procedure should be used when determining cosmetic corrosion performance for a particular coating system. SAE J Cosmetic Corrosion Lab Test. This test procedure has been field correlated, so it is claimed that the results obtained should correlate well to those . Salt Spray test (ASTM B) with exposures up to hours and the Cyclic Corrosion test (SAE J) with exposures up to and cycles. The latter.

Author: Kalrajas Bajin
Country: Myanmar
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 25 April 2004
Pages: 451
PDF File Size: 11.55 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.34 Mb
ISBN: 779-4-85991-183-6
Downloads: 19733
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudoshakar

Several studies have come to the conclusion that ASTM B does not provide a good test for coated aluminum alloys, or fails to predict the composition effects of aluminum-zinc alloy coatings on cold-rolled steel, or any other coatings for this matter.

When this is the case, you extend the dry stage over the weekend. It is also used elsewhere in the world where these auto companies have satellite manufacturing facilities, or joint collaborative ventures with other auto manufacturers. Please note The test standard summaries are for general guidance only.

The result is that salt spray test methods produce different corrosion mechanisms and different corrosion products than the more realistic, but more expensive, outdoor testing. One of the first steps was to develop a set of standard materials that the researchers could use to compare the laboratory tests to outdoor on-vehicle tests.

Inthey selected ten standard materials, including coated and uncoated parts, with a wide range of 2j334 compositions and thicknesses. Once researchers have agreed on what j234 to make in the test procedure, they will run a round-robin test to determine if the changes are really improvements. The test cycle is repeated daily, fully automatic cabinets have the option of running during the weekends or programming in a dry stage soak.

These differences can lead to differences in test results.

Test method SAE J2334

The reason that the ASTM B test methods do not accurately reproduce corrosion performance for auto parts is that they do not accurately reproduce the conditions in which automotive parts must exist.

Spray Method — periodic or continuous direct impingement spray j234 the salt solution over the 15 minute interval that ensures that the test specimens are kept wet for the entire 15 minute interval. As shown in the following figure, one test cycle requires 24 hours and wae three stages.

Canadian on-vehicle tests were conducted at Montreal, Quebec and St. In one test, they mounted panels of the standard materials on pickup trucks driven in Montreal, Quebec, and St. Contact Ascott for Further Information.

Related Articles  PURBA PASCHIM SUNIL GANGOPADHYAY PDF

Though believed to be accurate at the time of writing, this may change over time. Both are excellent browsers. They drove the trucks for five years and then measured the corrosion performance of the materials. Test specimens are placed in an enclosed chamber and exposed to a changing climate that comprises of the following 3 part repeating cycle.

Another difference between manual and automatic tests is that during automatic testing, you can use a salt spray in place of a salt dip. Website design by Peter Bourne Communications. To determine the real-world performance of these materials, researchers then ran a series of tests.

So this information should not be used as a substitute for referring to a complete test standard, at an appropriate revision level. In this context they can be considered to be equivalent and interchangeable terms. This website has been developed with modern browsers in mind to allow it to display at its best in a wide variety of viewing situations – including mobile viewing.

The test panels were mounted on the vehicles in both horizontal and vertical orientations to better represent the various surface orientations typically found in vehicle applications. This group strived to develop the knowledge of corrosion mechanisms and their replication in a controlled environment until, nearly 20 years later and after considering over available laboratory, proving ground, and outdoor corrosion tests, the SAE Surface Vehicle Standard, J Cosmetic Corrosion Lab Test, was published in June The samples must be subject to an application of salt solution consisting of the following formulas and by use of one of three methods shown as follows; 0.

The industry required a more predictive method of testing which would allow component performance to be addressed before field trials and product releases. Researchers are also working on improving the method for salt application. The development of SAE J was time consuming, but thorough.

Test Conditions Test specimens are placed in an enclosed chamber and exposed to a changing climate that comprises of the following 3 part repeating cycle. John’s Newfoundland for 5 years. SAE J is a relatively simple test to perform. The number of cycle repeats and therefore the test duration is variable.

Test method SAE J

For one thing, parts tested in a salt-spray cabinet are continuously wet, while those parts on a vehicle experience periods of wetness and dryness. Water fog method according to ASTM Dexcept that the collection rate is reduced from a range of 1. Another difference between the conditions in a salt spray test and real-world conditions is the salt concentration. You can run the tests manually or automatically. When running the test automatically, you do not need the extended dry stage.

Related Articles  CARMINE APPICE REALISTIC ROCK EBOOK DOWNLOAD

SAE J Cyclic Corrosion Assured Testing Services

When run manually, the standard allows for the fact that test personnel may not be available during weekends. The analysis showed that 80 cycles of the SAE J test corresponded to five years of on-vehicle testing.

Then, assuming that they are actually improvements, they will revise the standard and submit it to SAE. At least two substrates were chosen because the existence of proven corrosion testing results enabled them to be used to assure the consistency of the test.

The researchers then tested the standard materials with many different test methods, including SAE Jand then statistically analyzed their results to see which test method offered the best correlation to the real-world test results.

But we haven’t supported older browsers like IE8. Immersion Method — test specimens immersed j22334 the salt solution for a 15 minute interval of each test cycle. You need to upgrade your browser You are using Internet Explorer 8 This is considered an out of date browser.

The corrosion mechanisms of on-vehicle and laboratory tests were studied by Lehigh University, and the resulting analysis showed that similar corrosion products and modes were found in these tests as were found after conducting SAE J tests. There are several problems with ASTM B salt spray test when trying to rank the corrosion performance of automotive parts. Other differences include the temperature changes that occur in the real world and the fact that real-world conditions include salts other than NaCl.

For the specimens a minimum of 6, each sized While the results so far have been very good, the researchers are continuing to refine and improve the test, in an effort to improve both the repeatability and reproducibility of the test. One method of testing which was shown to be particularly indicative of the performance of components in the conditions in which vehicles operate was the Cyclic Corrosion Test CCT. As a result of early experience, the automotive industry took a lead role in the development of cyclic corrosion tests with the objective of producing results that better correlate with field exposure.

The researchers also ran similar experiments in Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.